Here's a simple little Flash movie called Hexagrammaton START
which has two interesting properties:
(or sooner
and the movie can be used for divination
What will you be up to
There aren't a whole lot of species that have lived longer than 110 million years. So far, pretty low stuff. Bacteria. Jellyfish. Insects. Basically the class of species that I will refer to as "yucky" or "kind of yucky". Which points to the weakly reasoned corollary that any successor species on the evolutionary path will look at humans and other mammals as being yucky or kind of yucky. And that our successors as dominant species will be transcendently cute.
On the other hand, cosmetology, the science of cosmetics, notes that no species which has attained the use of cosmetics has ever reversed that choice. I hazard that it would be likely that some members of any successor intelligent species would use cosmetics. Rouge could outlast humanity.
What other stuff we invented could outlast humanity? Maybe electromagnetic communication. Maybe the zipper. Maybe plumbing. Maybe trying to predict the future. Maybe sports.
When humans are extinct, will some form of soccer still be played by someone or something? Will members of that species bet on the games? Legally?
You can subscribe to [bracket bracket]
|
*The length of time it will take the Hexagrammaton to repeat -- 109,909,688 years -- was figured thusly:
Essentially, the Hexagrammaton consists of six copies of the same movie each with a slightly different playing length. Specifically: 611, 619, 625, 631, 641, and 653 frames long at a speed of 18 frames per second (which is slower on some slower computers). None of these numbers shares a prime divisor, so the pattern as a whole will only repeat after 611 x 619 x 625 x 631 x 641 x 653 frames. Which is about 110 million years. Longer even than the re-edit of Apocalypse Now.
I took a tiny detail of this picture, used a tracing program to render the bitmap as curves. Then I made the curves symmetrical. I am not so much the artist who made these curves, but rather the editor who extracted them from nature.
The shapes in the Hexagrammaton are derived from an image of water flowing in a stream.
©2001 Paul Smedberg who is slowly responsible for the content.